|
|
Post by semipotentwalrus on Jul 23, 2019 10:46:14 GMT -5
Autocorrect, I've got a new phone that I'm still learning. Although coporeal punishment would be punishment that applies to your coporeal form and thus be perfectly accurate as well (something that floats through walls is IN-coporeal, in that it doesn't have a body). Coporeal and corporal have the same latin roots as well.
|
|
|
|
Post by tannhauser42 on Jul 23, 2019 12:40:34 GMT -5
I think we just wanted to make sure it was corporals you wanted to punish instead of sergeants.  |
|
|
|
Post by adurot on Jul 23, 2019 13:23:50 GMT -5
I think we just wanted to make sure it was corporals you wanted to punish instead of sergeants. Doesn’t matter really, Trump would probably pardon them. |
|
|
|
Post by adurot on Jul 23, 2019 16:36:22 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by whemblycthulhu on Jul 23, 2019 17:19:33 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by semipotentwalrus on Jul 23, 2019 19:30:08 GMT -5
Apparently Article II of the Constitution lets Trump do whatever he wants as President. Can we get a comment on that from resident constitutionalist whembly?
|
|
|
|
Post by Disciple of Fate on Jul 24, 2019 0:58:29 GMT -5
On the nuclear proliferation front, it seems NK has build its first submarine capable of carrying ballistic missiles. I hope the US can still sleep well tonight now that the mainland is in range of the apparently non existent nuclear threat.
|
|
|
|
Post by semipotentwalrus on Jul 24, 2019 9:47:39 GMT -5
Mueller's apparently said he's confident he'd be able to charge Trump with obstruction of justice after Trump leaves office (apparently because I'm on my phone and can't check primary sources at the moment).
Exonerated my ass.
|
|
CommieCanUCK
Ye Olde King of OT
The poster formerly known as feeder
Posts: 979
|
Post by CommieCanUCK on Jul 24, 2019 11:21:48 GMT -5
Mueller's apparently said he's confident he'd be able to charge Trump with obstruction of justice after Trump leaves office (apparently because I'm on my phone and can't check primary sources at the moment). Exonerated my ass. If this is true.... I wonder how long before the loyal foot soldiers of the GOP start "just asking questions" about the constitutionality of term limits? |
|
|
|
Post by Disciple of Fate on Jul 24, 2019 11:32:22 GMT -5
If I'm thinking about the part I think you mean: he didn't say yes, but he explicitly didn't say no and stayed very vague. Overall he seems to agree with the idea that Trump was working against him.
This hearing has been a mess, Mueller didn't want to say much and the Repubs are acting like this hearing is in the 1930's congress in the Soviet Union. Must impress and vigorously defend dear leader!
|
|
CommieCanUCK
Ye Olde King of OT
The poster formerly known as feeder
Posts: 979
|
Post by CommieCanUCK on Jul 24, 2019 11:45:26 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Emblematic Wolfblade on Jul 24, 2019 13:08:48 GMT -5
That's what I've been saying for awhile. the GOP is ruining America, and if any member of the GOP decided to go play in traffic, it'd only be a net win for america. |
|
|
|
Post by Emblematic Wolfblade on Jul 24, 2019 13:14:55 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by whemblycthulhu on Jul 24, 2019 14:54:53 GMT -5
Apparently Article II of the Constitution lets Trump do whatever he wants as President. Can we get a comment on that from resident constitutionalist whembly? No idea what you're talking about. |
|
|
|
Post by whemblycthulhu on Jul 24, 2019 14:56:27 GMT -5
Mueller's apparently said he's confident he'd be able to charge Trump with obstruction of justice after Trump leaves office (apparently because I'm on my phone and can't check primary sources at the moment). Exonerated my ass. ...And he had to correct the statement again in the next hearing. This hearing is turning out to be a major dud for democrats. |
|
