|
Post by Emblematic Wolfblade on Aug 8, 2019 13:06:52 GMT -5
Oh, and another important piece of info from the conclusion:
The more I read of the conclusion, the more I question if you actually read that source baron.
|
|
dusa
Ye Olde King of OT
Posts: 555
|
Post by dusa on Aug 8, 2019 14:26:56 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 8, 2019 17:09:00 GMT -5
The more I read of the conclusion, the more I question if you actually read that source baron.
I read the source, but they're running on an assumption from the get go, that the cell phone is simply a tool for facilitating communication. Hence why I also linked the sources on how it altered brains.
And, frankly, guns are limiting the damage they can do. I dunno how many of you remember 71-72 when the US had far left terrorists, but they did over 2500 bombings in 18 months. People tend to forget how bad that was.
|
|
|
Post by Emblematic Wolfblade on Aug 8, 2019 18:34:13 GMT -5
I'm not saying guns are the problem, but the source directly says "cellphones simply enable these rebel groups to better communicate," which is a direct contradiction to your claim. These cellphones weren't radiating people, they aren't saying they started using a cellphone, and BOOM, 2 months later they were a crazy rebel bent on dismantling the government in the most violent way possible. And again, the source goes on to say
Suggesting cellphones make it easier to communicate ideas of all kinds, not just violent ones, at a glance.
I think your claim is a stretch at best (especially when we don't know for sure how cellphones affect the brain), just like saying more guns = more overall violence (unless someone can find something supporting that). What we can prove leads to more violence is radical rhetoric or ideology like trump, fox, etc are spewing and pushing.
|
|
|
Post by Emblematic Wolfblade on Aug 8, 2019 20:46:00 GMT -5
Hey, remember how ISIS is totally defeated? About that.
|
|
dusa
Ye Olde King of OT
Posts: 555
|
Post by dusa on Aug 8, 2019 21:21:16 GMT -5
White Nationalist rally organizer works for State. More career intelligence people getting fired or “resigning” to put the safety of our nation in the hands of Trump loyalists. Those are the same guys that have ignored any push towards focusing on domestic nationalist terror threats.
|
|
|
Post by mikosann on Aug 8, 2019 22:05:15 GMT -5
The more I read of the conclusion, the more I question if you actually read that source baron.
I read the source, but they're running on an assumption from the get go, that the cell phone is simply a tool for facilitating communication. Hence why I also linked the sources on how it altered brains.
And, frankly, guns are limiting the damage they can do. I dunno how many of you remember 71-72 when the US had far left terrorists, but they did over 2500 bombings in 18 months. People tend to forget how bad that was.
Uhhhh, the deadliest one killed four people, kinda weird to use it to say guns are limiting the damage when 30 plus just died from guns and we only need go back less than a week to remember that shit time.com/4501670/bombings-of-america-burrough/
|
|
|
Post by Disciple of Fate on Aug 9, 2019 0:27:33 GMT -5
Trying to find any number comes to 184 deaths over 2500 bombings, that does not sound that spectacular violence wise when one man with a gun can manage to kill 50 people nowadays.
|
|
|
Post by Disciple of Fate on Aug 9, 2019 0:54:07 GMT -5
White Nationalist rally organizer works for State. More career intelligence people getting fired or “resigning” to put the safety of our nation in the hands of Trump loyalists. Those are the same guys that have ignored any push towards focusing on domestic nationalist terror threats. Can't have all these pesky experts harassing his base now!
|
|
|
Post by semipotentwalrus on Aug 9, 2019 6:44:47 GMT -5
So you're telling me even the "Deep State" BS was projection?
|
|
|
Post by Disciple of Fate on Aug 9, 2019 10:53:47 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Least censored on the planet! on Aug 9, 2019 11:09:26 GMT -5
seeing as the vas majority is right wing violence or jihadist violence. So right-wing violence or right-wing violence. But Baron set out to prove its NOT guns, while this circles back to guns being the unique problem. There has to be a problem, unique to America, that guns have no effect on, to be able to make the case that guns aren't the inherently problematic factor to any regular problem you can point out. To be fair, isn't the healthcare system in the US also uniquely shitty? What kind of dumb fuck would link health insurance to employment status? Just how stupid is that? I believe that if you don’t incite (the legal definition) violence against a group, your criticism of the activities of that group (such as illegal immigrants), cannot be held morally responsible in any way for violence against that group. (Deliberate slander or libel might be a different story.) Even if that rhetoric is vigorous and hyperbolic, such as terminologies that is not the norm (e.g. “invasion”), I can’t say the rhetoric is morally responsible for a shooting. Dude, that's incredibly myopic. Remember remember: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_T%C3%A9l%C3%A9vision_Libre_des_Mille_Collines
|
|
|
Post by Disciple of Fate on Aug 9, 2019 11:23:29 GMT -5
seeing as the vas majority is right wing violence or jihadist violence. So right-wing violence or right-wing violence. But Baron set out to prove its NOT guns, while this circles back to guns being the unique problem. There has to be a problem, unique to America, that guns have no effect on, to be able to make the case that guns aren't the inherently problematic factor to any regular problem you can point out. To be fair, isn't the healthcare system in the US also uniquely shitty? What kind of dumb fuck would link health insurance to employment status? Just how stupid is that? Yes both forms are right wing, but its divided into two categories because its 'convenient'. To be fair though, their are more involved studies that also divide up right wing terrorism into white supremacy, anti government etc. I have no clue why many people just accept healthcare being tied to your job. Its just hard to comprehend that a wealthy country is ok with what amounts to letting poor people die. Just today Lindsey Graham again promised that if Trump and Repubs win they will kill the ACA.
|
|
|
Post by tannhauser42 on Aug 9, 2019 18:55:35 GMT -5
|
|
dusa
Ye Olde King of OT
Posts: 555
|
Post by dusa on Aug 9, 2019 19:15:10 GMT -5
I’m sure it’s a total coincidence, but the whole Scar speech in the new Lion King just felt very Trumpian and the hunt was just a metaphor for capitalism.
|
|