|
Post by Disciple of Fate on Nov 7, 2023 6:10:24 GMT -5
Feels like it is a mix of both in my immediate circle? People work from home for some days, but not all days. So they keep office space that they currently have under 5 year contracts, but aren't actively planning on downsizing. WFH full time and getting rid of expensive individual office space seems like a no-brainer, but the older management still seems intent on having a physical space that is just available for 'their' company. So you end up with full price office space with a half empty office.
|
|
|
Post by herzlos on Nov 7, 2023 7:58:12 GMT -5
I think it'll depend on the size and role to some extent.
Some examples:
A friend of mine does graphic design for a large company, their office had about 10 staff and most of their customers were remote. So it made a lot of sense for them to let the lease on their city centre office expire and let everyone WFH full time. If they need to meet in person they hire a function room somewhere, but something like WeWork would be ideal even if it was infrequent.
Places that need a physical presence, like a solicitor or estate agent may be forced to keep a proper storefront even if they are rarely needed.
In my case, I work for a big multinational corporation in an office of about 100 staff. With WFH the place is rarely more than 25% occupied but it probably wouldn't save us much money taking up ~25ish desks and a couple of conference rooms at a flexi working space, so we'll renew our lease and stay put. It of course gives us plenty of room for expansion as long as we co-ordinate who is in.
I think there's still definitely a prestige factor to having your own building in a nice location. I'm not sure it makes any difference to me but I'm not in any kind of senior position.
|
|
|
Post by easye on Nov 7, 2023 10:47:05 GMT -5
The official market is fighting WFH tooth and nail. It's not just a prestige factor, for those who own buildings it is a huge asset that they can not allow to lose value by making a WFH transition.
Plus, WeWork had some behind the scenes malarkey IIRC.
|
|
|
Post by easye on Nov 9, 2023 10:39:35 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by easye on Nov 14, 2023 10:28:44 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by easye on Nov 17, 2023 14:16:17 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by easye on Jan 9, 2024 11:53:58 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by bobtheinquisitor on Jan 9, 2024 13:07:06 GMT -5
I really hope they block this merger. I don’t want my ability to buy food subject to more anti-consumer behavior. Shit’s bad enough already.
|
|
|
Post by easye on Jan 19, 2024 14:53:29 GMT -5
Sports Illustrated is dead..... 'Sports Illustrated' lays off most of its staffwww.npr.org/2024/01/19/1225680000/sports-illustrated-lays-off-most-of-its-staffReading between the lines, it looks like the victim of Vulture Capitalism. The new company bought it, used name recognition to get a ton of loans that they then paid to their leadership team, and then let Sports Illustrated fail to make the debt payments on those loans and is now closing them. As a bonus they are also sticking it to the writer's union too! Win-win for management! Yeah Capitalism! I am sure that is exactly the way Adam Smith envisioned it! /S
|
|
|
Post by pacific on Jan 22, 2024 11:24:56 GMT -5
The same thing happened to most of the video game magazine industry in the UK - from what I read a single company bought them all out and then, as they weren't profitable enough (bearing in mind that they were still making money) closed them down. I am not sure if it was done in a similar manner to the above, but really the people that instigated it need throwing into the sea.
|
|
|
Post by easye on Jan 22, 2024 11:39:34 GMT -5
I heard a follow-up story on this and I was wrong!
The people who own the rights for SI are different than the people who actually publish SI. The company that published could not pay the licensing fee, and the license was voided. This led to the lay-offs. The two companies are now negotiating a new settlement, and most of the laid-off employees are expected to get their jobs back once that happens.
A few random thoughts:
1. WTF kind of set-up is that?
2. They license SI to gambling and resort companies. If the magazine is dead, is the brand still worth anything?
3. It almost seems like an orchestrated plot to work around Union rules and only hire back the cheapest workers?
|
|
|
Post by easye on Jan 23, 2024 10:54:54 GMT -5
Another tech company cutting jobs..... TikTok cuts jobs as tech layoffs continue to mountwww.npr.org/2024/01/22/1226127366/tiktok-cuts-jobs-tech-layoffs-chinaIs the trouble in this sector a portent of things to come, or is it just this industry coming back to reality? I recall when the Dot.Com tech-boom ended, and that had a wider impact on the economy in general.
|
|
|
Post by easye on Jan 24, 2024 13:44:15 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by herzlos on Jan 25, 2024 14:09:35 GMT -5
I find it don't use eBay much these days, to the point I don't even have it on my phone. It's gone from an auction site full of random stuff and bargains to essentially just another online store front with dubious quality control. So I'll use it for low weight, low value stuff (like garden bags, bolts, etc) and stuff I can't find anywhere else, but that's about it.
It also seems to have a terrible reputation amongst sellers for always siding with buyers and allowing scams.
I'm assuming that Amazon and Facebook Marketplace have really hurt eBay.
|
|
|
Post by Disciple of Fate on Jan 26, 2024 11:20:17 GMT -5
Hard to believe eBay has a staff of 10.000, given the apparently stagnant nature of the site, you wonder what the labor division of those 10.000 is/was. Also the label retailer feels generous, isn't it mostly a third-party facilitator? Not like they sell or warehouse directly, right?
|
|