mdgv2
Ye Olde King of OT
Posts: 949
Member is Online
|
Post by mdgv2 on Sept 9, 2023 16:34:21 GMT -5
Also also also? Time Team. If you’ve seen my associated wibblings on Dakka, they’re back. And a whole bunch of classic episodes are up on YouTube, free to see with your peepers. Unless they’re region locked. Which they may be. I dunno, I’ve only seen them whilst in the UK. If you’re scratching your bonce wondering what Time Team is? It’s near televisual perfection. A show about digs at archaeological sites, which simplifies the art without dumbing it down. Sir Tony Robinson is our host, and does a bang up job as the audience proxy, asking salient questions of the experts in the field(s), who respond in plain English terms. Nothing is sensationalised either. It’s wonderful. And it’s addictive. Here’s a link for you. www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFzqDn2lOz8
|
|
|
Post by Haighus on Sept 15, 2023 14:31:38 GMT -5
arkeonews.net/a-shipboard-14th-century-cannon-found-off-the-swedish-coast-may-be-the-oldest-in-europe/This is quite exciting if you have an interest in early artillery. It is interesting that this cannon appears to be the earliest known example of a couple of features thought to arise later. My thoughts, based on the poor-quality metallurgy of this example, is that guns were probably more common in this era than previously thought, but that many, even most were broken during use and therefore very few survive intact. The fundamental problem with tools being that they are made to be used and tend to get broken and recycled eventually.
|
|
|
Post by easye on Nov 14, 2023 10:38:09 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by easye on Jan 24, 2024 13:39:50 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by easye on Jan 24, 2024 13:52:00 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by easye on Feb 22, 2024 10:41:10 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Haighus on Feb 22, 2024 11:36:52 GMT -5
Catch all thread for anything about history, I guess, but specifically started for this: ondemand.spectrum.net/tv/science-channel/24698962/ancient-armageddon/I said a while back on ETC that a couple friends of mine were filming for a show that was being made essentially about Eric Cline's 1177BC, a book about the societal collapses in the Eastern Mediterranean at the end of the Bronze Age, and a couple folks asked me to alert them when it was being broadcast, so here we are. I've not seen it and don't know of it will be any good (and I find the title alarming, as I'm sure does at least one of the aforementioned friends), but maybe it's good! EDIT2: WRONG SHOW. Im talking about Ancient Apocalypse below... What is with these names? Oh, I don't think anyone followed up on this here but essentially... The show is all conspiracy theory garbage that generally misrepresented the experts interviewed for it and paints them in a very unflattering light. The main presenter, a quack called Graham Hancock, does the whole "I am shunned by the exclusionary establishment who don't like new ideas" schtick when actually it is just because he doesn't have any evidence for his claims. Tl;dw: he reckons there was a single, advanced world-wide global culture that left no material remains and collapsed during the Younger Dryad event, with all the actual early civilisations being shellshocked survivors. This is based on some cherrypicked, vaguely similar themes found in disconnected cultures (and in one case a geological feature he thinks is manmade...) and unsupported assertions that various settlements and monuments are actually way older than the oldest currently-found evidence. These unevidenced dates all mysteriously correspond to the Younger Dryad event to support his theory and he essentially pulled out of his arse. Very disappointing show, Ancient Aliens level of shit. It is a shame too because it went to some genuinely interesting, lesser-known archaelogical sites that deserve proper documentaries about them. Edit: I will say the show is well crafted. It starts gentle, with stuff that generally has evidence or is a plausible hypothesis with little in the way of outlandish claims. But over time becomes increasingly detached from reality in crafting this narrative of a global megaculture. I can see how this would convince people taking it at face value or not paying too much attention to the logical jumps.
|
|
|
Post by A Town Called Malus on Feb 22, 2024 13:34:43 GMT -5
Catch all thread for anything about history, I guess, but specifically started for this: ondemand.spectrum.net/tv/science-channel/24698962/ancient-armageddon/I said a while back on ETC that a couple friends of mine were filming for a show that was being made essentially about Eric Cline's 1177BC, a book about the societal collapses in the Eastern Mediterranean at the end of the Bronze Age, and a couple folks asked me to alert them when it was being broadcast, so here we are. I've not seen it and don't know of it will be any good (and I find the title alarming, as I'm sure does at least one of the aforementioned friends), but maybe it's good! Oh, I don't think anyone followed up on this here but essentially... The show is all conspiracy theory garbage that generally misrepresented the experts interviewed for it and paints them in a very unflattering light. The main presenter, a quack called Graham Hancock, does the whole "I am shunned by the exclusionary establishment who don't like new ideas" schtick when actually it is just because he doesn't have any evidence for his claims. Tl;dw: he reckons there was a single, advanced world-wide global culture that left no material remains and collapsed during the Younger Dryad event, with all the actual early civilisations being shellshocked survivors. This is based on some cherrypicked, vaguely similar themes found in disconnected cultures (and in one case a geological feature he thinks is manmade...) and unsupported assertions that various settlements and monuments are actually way older than the oldest currently-found evidence. These unevidenced dates all mysteriously correspond to the Younger Dryad event to support his theory and he essentially pulled out of his arse. Very disappointing show, Ancient Aliens level of shit. It is a shame too because it went to some genuinely interesting, lesser-known archaelogical sites that deserve proper documentaries about them. Edit: I will say the show is well crafted. It starts gentle, with stuff that generally has evidence or is a plausible hypothesis with little in the way of outlandish claims. But over time becomes increasingly detached from reality in crafting this narrative of a global megaculture. I can see how this would convince people taking it at face value or not paying too much attention to the logical jumps. Ah, they pulled one of those bait and switches on them. Dan Olson of Folding Ideas has a good video about how a load of geocentrists did a similar thing to a bunch of physicists. They even got Kate Mulgrew, of Mrs. Columbo fame, to narrate it.
|
|
|
Post by bobtheinquisitor on Feb 22, 2024 13:40:11 GMT -5
On that bit of Stone Age wall… what is the cut off point between structure and megastructure?
|
|
|
Post by Haighus on Feb 22, 2024 13:58:14 GMT -5
Oh, I don't think anyone followed up on this here but essentially... The show is all conspiracy theory garbage that generally misrepresented the experts interviewed for it and paints them in a very unflattering light. The main presenter, a quack called Graham Hancock, does the whole "I am shunned by the exclusionary establishment who don't like new ideas" schtick when actually it is just because he doesn't have any evidence for his claims. Tl;dw: he reckons there was a single, advanced world-wide global culture that left no material remains and collapsed during the Younger Dryad event, with all the actual early civilisations being shellshocked survivors. This is based on some cherrypicked, vaguely similar themes found in disconnected cultures (and in one case a geological feature he thinks is manmade...) and unsupported assertions that various settlements and monuments are actually way older than the oldest currently-found evidence. These unevidenced dates all mysteriously correspond to the Younger Dryad event to support his theory and he essentially pulled out of his arse. Very disappointing show, Ancient Aliens level of shit. It is a shame too because it went to some genuinely interesting, lesser-known archaelogical sites that deserve proper documentaries about them. Edit: I will say the show is well crafted. It starts gentle, with stuff that generally has evidence or is a plausible hypothesis with little in the way of outlandish claims. But over time becomes increasingly detached from reality in crafting this narrative of a global megaculture. I can see how this would convince people taking it at face value or not paying too much attention to the logical jumps. Ah, they pulled one of those bait and switches on them. Dan Olson of Folding Ideas has a good video about how a load of geocentrists did a similar thing to a bunch of physicists. They even got Kate Mulgrew, of Mrs. Columbo fame, to narrate it. Er... I mixed up the shows. My spiel was for Ancient Apocalypse, a different but very similarly-named show. I've edited above.
|
|
|
Post by Haighus on Feb 22, 2024 14:01:19 GMT -5
On that bit of Stone Age wall… what is the cut off point between structure and megastructure? Good question, because half a mile by itself doesn't mean a wall is that big. There is a substantial difference between a half mile segment of dry stone wall for keeping sheep vs a half mile segment of crenellated stone fortification wall, for example. I'd guess this wall must be quite tall to prevent deer jumping it? They are agile critters.
|
|
mdgv2
Ye Olde King of OT
Posts: 949
Member is Online
|
Post by mdgv2 on Feb 22, 2024 14:03:32 GMT -5
Could all be relative, based on current understanding of the evolution of structure building.
For instance, Hunter Gatherers assembling a half mile drystone wall may be considered a greater achievement than someone building a brick and mortar wall of the same dimensions in the 19th Century?
|
|
nfe
OT Cowboy
Posts: 211
|
Post by nfe on Feb 28, 2024 4:44:36 GMT -5
For what it's worth, I don't recall having ever read any ancient construction being described as a 'megastructure'' in any academic context. I only know it from sci-fi and pseudoachaeology. I don't think it's well-defined?
|
|
|
Post by easye on Feb 28, 2024 10:55:20 GMT -5
|
|
mdgv2
Ye Olde King of OT
Posts: 949
Member is Online
|
Post by mdgv2 on Feb 28, 2024 17:21:19 GMT -5
Pants wettingly exciting stuff!
|
|