|
Post by republicanpsycho on Oct 12, 2023 12:15:46 GMT -5
None of these books are banned they can be bought almost anywhere. Camp of the saints is effectively banned.
Your “banned” books should be though because they’re filled with disgusting gay porn and lurid violence propagandizing white people.
|
|
|
Post by Haighus on Oct 12, 2023 13:01:56 GMT -5
...banned from school libraries is the context...
|
|
|
Post by republicanpsycho on Oct 12, 2023 13:41:08 GMT -5
That’s not nearly banned enough. What’s your justification on school libraries with books full of gay porn?
|
|
|
Post by Emblematic Wolfblade on Oct 12, 2023 14:28:25 GMT -5
That’s not nearly banned enough. What’s your justification on school libraries with books full of gay porn? Hordini grog is back, surely this deserves a ban, yeah?
|
|
|
Post by Haighus on Oct 12, 2023 14:37:37 GMT -5
That’s not nearly banned enough. What’s your justification on school libraries with books full of gay porn? Because they aren't full of gay porn. Anyway, books containing sexual topics as part of a narrative is normal for teenagers, y'know. That isn't the same as porn. People can get married and start churning out babies at 16 in much of the US, it isn't healthy that the first someone learns about sex is when they get married.
|
|
|
Post by republicanpsycho on Oct 12, 2023 14:50:26 GMT -5
That’s not nearly banned enough. What’s your justification on school libraries with books full of gay porn? Because they aren't full of gay porn. Anyway, books containing sexual topics as part of a narrative is normal for teenagers, y'know. That isn't the same as porn. People can get married and start churning out babies at 16 in much of the US, it isn't healthy that the first someone learns about sex is when they get married. Here’s your banned book: getoutspoken.com/schools/exclusive-florida-moms-discover-trove-of-pornography-crt-in-public-school-libraryEDIT: Don't misrepresent other members. - Hordini
|
|
|
Post by Disciple of Fate on Oct 12, 2023 15:20:28 GMT -5
Imagine using a website that unironically uses the term fake news, so you know they are up to some absolute BS.
|
|
|
Post by adurot on Oct 12, 2023 15:23:27 GMT -5
I can’t even see the website, it was already blocked when I clicked the link.
|
|
|
Post by Disciple of Fate on Oct 12, 2023 15:27:08 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Haighus on Oct 12, 2023 15:46:20 GMT -5
Because they aren't full of gay porn. Anyway, books containing sexual topics as part of a narrative is normal for teenagers, y'know. That isn't the same as porn. People can get married and start churning out babies at 16 in much of the US, it isn't healthy that the first someone learns about sex is when they get married. “its normal for kids to be shown explicit depictions of gay men fucking each other with descriptions of anal sex” -Haighus Here’s your banned book: getoutspoken.com/schools/exclusive-florida-moms-discover-trove-of-pornography-crt-in-public-school-libraryNice libelous strawman you have there... Regarding the book. Yes, clearly that book has graphic depictions. It isn't appropriate for all ages. It would however be appropriate for most teenagers, and looks to be pretty solid sex ed explaining some of the realities of sex vs the myths that get spread. Teenagers are supposed to learn about sex. Did you not learn about sex as a teenager?
|
|
|
Post by Least censored on the planet! on Oct 13, 2023 6:46:26 GMT -5
But then I live in a country where you get responsibly taught sex education in the equivalent of middle school. Good countries start sex education very early.Teenagers are supposed to learn about sex. Did you not learn about sex as a teenager? He learned everything he had to learn from that documentary website called "Blacked". (It wasn't actually a documentary but he didn't realize this) But seriously yeah it's better not to learn from the many terrible porn websites...
|
|
|
Post by Haighus on Oct 13, 2023 6:52:24 GMT -5
Sex ed in a broad sense should start in primary school, yes. But discussion of actual sex acts is a later thing for teenagers.
|
|
|
Post by herzlos on Oct 13, 2023 6:57:53 GMT -5
Nice libelous strawman you have there... Regarding the book. Yes, clearly that book has graphic depictions. It isn't appropriate for all ages. It would however be appropriate for most teenagers, and looks to be pretty solid sex ed explaining some of the realities of sex vs the myths that get spread. Teenagers are supposed to learn about sex. Did you not learn about sex as a teenager? I suspect he was told it was bad and to avoid it. It's a plan that's worked well for the teen pregnancy capital of the world...
|
|
|
Post by Disciple of Fate on Oct 13, 2023 7:35:23 GMT -5
But seriously yeah it's better not to learn from the many terrible porn websites... I think this is the main issue for kids growing up today, it is far more accessible at earlier ages. If you look at that specific book deemded as "too pornographic" for 14 year olds, you must really not be aware how many 14 year olds have already seen far more just by having a smartphone with internet access, even if unlooked for. Earlier (and age appropriate) is better, because the internet has also made risky interactions easier.
|
|
|
Post by Disciple of Fate on Oct 13, 2023 7:37:31 GMT -5
I suspect he was told it was bad and to avoid it. It's a plan that's worked well for the teen pregnancy capital of the world... Given what he writes so freely here, it might be avoiding him...
|
|