|
Post by herzlos on May 11, 2024 3:02:26 GMT -5
I would like to see this study redone, but with different names. Employers do prefer easier to pronounce names, and many of those Black names don't exactly roll off the tongue. Swap out some Jims and Johns for Regenold and Geoffrey. And they are 'easier to pronounce' because they are 'white' names...
I know of a few white names that Americans can't pronounce (mine included, so I use a different name when I can), with a hard R or and ay (as in hay) sound. Craig for instance is not pronounced creg.
I've never really thought about it but they seem to try once or twice and then give up, and no-one really bothers to correct them, so I guess the same will happen with names from other languages. They do seem to be more willing to try and tackle the new unique white names like Mackeileleahghghgh, or mnop (Noel). But I can't tell how much of that is real or parody any more. There's definitely a lot more deliberately stupid names of kids in schools now.
|
|
|
Post by easye on May 13, 2024 8:57:16 GMT -5
I would like to see this study redone, but with different names. Employers do prefer easier to pronounce names, and many of those Black names don't exactly roll off the tongue. Swap out some Jims and Johns for Regenold and Geoffrey. This study has been done numerous times, with various names and always gets pretty much the same results.
|
|
|
Post by easye on May 15, 2024 13:28:18 GMT -5
|
|
skyth
OT Cowboy
Posts: 487
Member is Online
|
Post by skyth on May 15, 2024 14:40:43 GMT -5
I believe some democratic congresscritters sent a letter to Biden with suggestions on how to deal with the grocery chains that were artificially inflating food prices to stuff their pockets during the pandemic. Hopefully this has an effect as well.
|
|
|
Post by easye on May 17, 2024 10:28:37 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by easye on Jun 11, 2024 10:02:32 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by herzlos on Jun 11, 2024 14:57:41 GMT -5
Another study about RTO with fairly obvious but interesting results: www.bamboohr.com/resources/guides/return-to-officeWhich seems to track with what I've seen. When I'm in the office very little work seems to actually be happening but it seems to all be about visibility and I'm pretty much only in on days my boss is so it doesn't feel like a total waste of time. And the zinger, buried away at the bottom: Sadly, I feel there may be a tiny element of that going on at my place with increased pressure to be in the office, but my life revolves around working from home which I've been doing successfully for years now and my productivity will be annihilated if I need to travel in daily.
|
|
|
Post by Peregrine on Jun 12, 2024 3:18:53 GMT -5
IOW, 68% of managers are liars as well as useless parasites.
|
|
|
Post by easye on Jun 12, 2024 9:05:42 GMT -5
Management-type and it is a lot easier to track and keep things squared away in the Office. You have to work a lot harder to keep relationships going in a WFH environment. However, it can be done with simple and small changes to your routines, processes, and the way you work.
I anticipated a "RTO" policy, so I made sure we sold our building during COVID so that RTO was not an option. Tee-hee! Tee-hee!
|
|
|
Post by adurot on Jun 12, 2024 14:17:25 GMT -5
IOW, 68% of managers are liars as well as useless parasites. I’m a manager…
|
|
|
Post by easye on Jun 27, 2024 11:56:04 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by bobtheinquisitor on Jun 27, 2024 15:40:07 GMT -5
That’s a weird definition of wealthy. Maybe it’s just because I’m in California, but 100,000 is not wealthy; it’s barely enough to live on if one has any kind of medical issues at all.
|
|
|
Post by easye on Jun 27, 2024 16:02:21 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by herzlos on Jun 27, 2024 18:00:53 GMT -5
I'm not convinced someone that can "dialing back restaurant visits and entertainment" is struggling to make ends meet. These are people who've found that the cost of living increase has bitten into their spare cash but aren't likely to be worried about paying for their necessities. I'll happily accept that some people on $100k+ may be struggling with higher mortgage payments and housing costs, cash flow issues etc. but many could presumably downgrade cars or holidays etc if they were actually stuck.
You can see that from the figures - 31% are worried about paying bills but only 17% are cutting essential spending like food/medical.
But then I'm coming at it from seeing people who can't afford supermarket food and can't even dream of restaurants.
|
|
|
Post by Haighus on Jun 28, 2024 2:03:03 GMT -5
Yeah, there is a difference between "can't afford my current standard of living" and "can't afford to live". I'm circling the former but I'm under no illusions that I'm comfortably far from the latter.
|
|