|
|
Post by dabbler on Jul 18, 2024 21:08:35 GMT -5
Took him a day to start calling non-white people mongrels,
Edit: apologies to Hordini
|
|
|
|
Post by greyeminence on Jul 18, 2024 21:22:12 GMT -5
The things you people get hung up on. White/black/indian isn't black. She can't even pretend to be black well. And I wonder if Biden will drop, if he does then his family is finished in politics, Jill and Hunter won't allow it.They need him. dabbler"Our democracy is about to be destroyed, Putins coming, and God isn't real. Did you just use a heckin racial slur!" |
|
|
|
Post by herzlos on Jul 19, 2024 4:23:50 GMT -5
<abbr>(Gah. Quotes went wrong but I can't delete?)
</abbr>
|
|
|
|
Post by semipotentwalrus on Jul 19, 2024 5:08:36 GMT -5
she and Candace Owens are not the same species. To quote George Takei as the Emperor of Japan: "You are made of stupid." While we're at it, you still haven't apologised for calling me a pedophile while cutting off half the quote you used as "evidence". Care to comment on that?
EDIT:
I don't think Hordini can be held responsible for someone with clear issues deciding to create new accounts to continue being an example of the worst of humanity every now and then, there's only so much that can reasonably be done.
|
|
|
|
Post by herzlos on Jul 19, 2024 5:21:10 GMT -5
The things you people get hung up on. White/black/indian isn't black. She can't even pretend to be black well. And I wonder if Biden will drop, if he does then his family is finished in politics, Jill and Hunter won't allow it.They need him. You understand how that's a distinction without a difference, right? She's not white, and that's what upsets a lot of people. White people, particularly racists, aren't that good at differentiating anything beyond white and not white. |
|
|
|
Post by Disciple of Fate on Jul 19, 2024 5:38:51 GMT -5
It also makes little sense, her father is a black Jamaican. She is as much 'Indian' as she is 'black'. Leave it to the house troll to engage in racial purity quotas.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hordini on Jul 19, 2024 7:03:40 GMT -5
Took him a day to start calling non-white people mongrels, glad he got let back in Hordini... What do you mean let back in? I didn't let him back in. He created a new account, which I've now banned. I can't control who makes new accounts using different IP addresses, I can only address them when they show up. |
|
|
|
Post by pacific on Jul 19, 2024 9:11:23 GMT -5
And just like the cloud of grey mist in the profile photo, he is gone.
Have read rumours (on social media, but from a journalist) that Biden stepping down is likely to be announced over the weekend (possibly Sunday).
|
|
|
|
Post by A Town Called Malus on Jul 19, 2024 9:45:01 GMT -5
Took him a day to start calling non-white people mongrels, glad he got let back in Hordini... What do you mean let back in? I didn't let him back in. He created a new account, which I've now banned. I can't control who makes new accounts using different IP addresses, I can only address them when they show up. Is it possible to shut down the creation of new accounts? |
|
|
|
Post by dabbler on Jul 19, 2024 9:51:20 GMT -5
Took him a day to start calling non-white people mongrels, glad he got let back in Hordini... What do you mean let back in? I didn't let him back in. He created a new account, which I've now banned. I can't control who makes new accounts using different IP addresses, I can only address them when they show up. I'll put my hand up and say my bad, all the greyX accounts blurred together and I thought a ban had just lapsed after 12 months or something. I apologise sincerely |
|
|
|
Post by Hordini on Jul 19, 2024 9:53:53 GMT -5
What do you mean let back in? I didn't let him back in. He created a new account, which I've now banned. I can't control who makes new accounts using different IP addresses, I can only address them when they show up. Is it possible to shut down the creation of new accounts? It looks like there are two options in that regard: disabling new account registrations, and restricting new account registrations. The latter allows new members to request an account, but they won't be able to post until their account is approved. Are either of those something we want to do? The problem with the first is we won't ever get any new members. The problem with the second is I may end up approving someone who has already been banned if their initial account request has a different username and doesn't contain any red flags. I already strongly dislike the implication in this thread that I've "allowed" someone back, and this option could technically make that true if I inadvertently approved a new account for someone previously banned. |
|
|
|
Post by Hordini on Jul 19, 2024 9:56:24 GMT -5
What do you mean let back in? I didn't let him back in. He created a new account, which I've now banned. I can't control who makes new accounts using different IP addresses, I can only address them when they show up. I'll put my hand up and say my bad, all the greyX accounts blurred together and I thought a ban had just lapsed after 12 months or something. I apologise sincerely Thank you. Apology accepted. To be clear, all of the bans here so far have been permanent. I'm not messing around with giving people short time outs, at least not at this time (and especially not for the type of stuff they've all been banned for). At least right now, when the same people show back up, it's because they've made a new account. |
|
|
|
Post by dabbler on Jul 19, 2024 10:35:51 GMT -5
Is it possible to shut down the creation of new accounts? It looks like there are two options in that regard: disabling new account registrations, and restricting new account registrations. The latter allows new members to request an account, but they won't be able to post until their account is approved. Are either of those something we want to do? The problem with the first is we won't ever get any new members. The problem with the second is I may end up approving someone who has already been banned if their initial account request has a different username and doesn't contain any red flags. I already strongly dislike the implication in this thread that I've "allowed" someone back, and this option could technically make that true if I inadvertently approved a new account for someone previously banned. Nah. He's showing up very rarely and it's really only him who is a problem. Not worth throwing out anyone who does want to join just because one person makes an issue every 6 months or so |
|
|
|
Post by Hordini on Jul 19, 2024 10:57:26 GMT -5
It looks like there are two options in that regard: disabling new account registrations, and restricting new account registrations. The latter allows new members to request an account, but they won't be able to post until their account is approved. Are either of those something we want to do? The problem with the first is we won't ever get any new members. The problem with the second is I may end up approving someone who has already been banned if their initial account request has a different username and doesn't contain any red flags. I already strongly dislike the implication in this thread that I've "allowed" someone back, and this option could technically make that true if I inadvertently approved a new account for someone previously banned. Nah. He's showing up very rarely and it's really only him who is a problem. Not worth throwing out anyone who does want to join just because one person makes an issue every 6 months or so Okay. I'm fine with that and I tend to agree. So far I've been able to ban alternate accounts relatively quickly, so when it does happen it usually isn't a problem longer than a day or two. If it happens again and I haven't dealt with it here within a day or two, those who are members on Dakka can always PM me there as well. |
|
|
|
Post by easye on Jul 19, 2024 11:11:48 GMT -5
It looks like there are two options in that regard: disabling new account registrations, and restricting new account registrations. The latter allows new members to request an account, but they won't be able to post until their account is approved. Are either of those something we want to do? The problem with the first is we won't ever get any new members. The problem with the second is I may end up approving someone who has already been banned if their initial account request has a different username and doesn't contain any red flags. I already strongly dislike the implication in this thread that I've "allowed" someone back, and this option could technically make that true if I inadvertently approved a new account for someone previously banned. Nah. He's showing up very rarely and it's really only him who is a problem. Not worth throwing out anyone who does want to join just because one person makes an issue every 6 months or so Agreed. Hordini you are doing just great. Thanks for the work. |
|
